How Many Have Figured Out That the State’s Only Plan is Mass Depopulation and Control of the Rest of Humanity? Not Enough!

“Alpha waves in the human brain are between 6 and 8 hertz. The wave frequency of the human cavity resonates between 6 and 8 hertz. All biological systems operate in the same frequency range. The human brain’s alpha waves function in this range and the electrical resonance of the earth is between 6 and 8 hertz. Thus, our entire biological system – the brain and the earth itself – work on the same frequencies. If we can control that resonate system electronically, we can directly control the entire mental system of humankind.”
Nikola Tesla

I have held the position, and stand by it, that the masses are responsible for their own enslavement, especially over the past three years, when all plans to take over humanity have escalated almost beyond imagination. With that said, is there now desperation evident by the ruling class due to more waking up to all the obvious lies and deception? The rulers and their political pawns gave power to the people voluntarily, and seem to be going in many different directions all at the same time.

Fake ‘viruses,’ world war threats, food and energy shortages, ‘global warming,’ transhumanism, ridiculous gender nonsense, political false flags, and more. Is this an indication of confidence in their takeover conspiracy, or is it a sign of panic? My hope, of course, would be the latter, but while still not convinced, it seems obvious that signs of uncertainty have arisen in the mindset of the ruling ‘elites.’ If this means that the rulers are fearful of their lies being rejected, and are reacting erratically in order to perpetuate the propaganda, that would be a good thing.

While more awakening is certainly happening, it is not at any level which could cause enough uproar to greatly slow or stop the totalitarian assault on this and other populations. With so much obvious deceit, lies, criminal behavior by the state, and open hostility toward the masses, especially those who question the false narratives, why hasn’t anger and dissent become much more prevalent? Could this be due to a mental duality of sorts of the common man; one in which confusion and fear simultaneously reside?

Simple ignorance cannot explain away such a submissive attitude by the people at large, given that the horrid effects are not only nationwide, but worldwide. Has the general population been not only dumbed down beyond recognition by the system but also psychologically or physiologically manipulated to react in a certain manner? If this hypothesis seems far-fetched, how can one explain how so many all at the same time, act in the same manner and accept and comply with such extreme draconian measures mandated by the state; measures that dramatically alter their lives and families in very adverse ways?

There are very many writers and reporters today who are changing their position about the tyrannical and totalitarian position we face, and instead of continuing to point out the realities of this horrendous societal transformation, are behaving and presenting a picture of ‘hope’ and a positive outlook based on unfounded optimism that awakening by the masses is evident.

Pointing out the good can be uplifting, but pointing out only the good in the face of tyranny, condemning others exposing the truth, and forcing that position due to tiring of the actuality of our predicament, creates a result of unwarranted false hope. It is not that doom is all there is, but honesty, and a penchant for only pursuing truth, is what is necessary in order to move forward to a position desired by those with a passion for freedom.

Societies that accomplish success in gaining freedom, at least some freedom, are almost always the result of a complete collapse or destruction of the current economic, governing, and state systems. This indicates that people in general, as has been evident throughout history, do not come to a position of proper mass dissent until there is no other option available. In my opinion, this is why most all revolutions fail to bring about long-term solutions to combat tyranny and do not achieve lasting progress toward liberty. The natural result of these belated and last-minute efforts can do more harm than not, as they are always reactions after total failure has occurred, and therefore can lead to a regressive conclusion with a new dictatorial regime in power.

In today’s world, is this attitude based on ignorance, fear, or both? Is it simply indifference at a mass level, and if so, why? Are these attitudes natural, or are they programmed into the minds of people over their lifetimes due to indoctrination by government, government (‘public’) schools, the mainstream media, and mass peer pressure? Are other psychological and physical methods of submission, including extreme propaganda, being used to control the bulk of society? In my mind, it is a combination of all these things.

We live in a new world. It is a world steeped in technology, harmful radio waves, in constant propaganda, a purposely poisonous environment, and extreme state-manufactured division. We are bombarded from every direction at once, and non-compliance with draconian totalitarianism is presented by nefarious forces as a threat to all. The result is mass hatred;  not hatred of a controlling and evil ruling class, but hatred toward each other.

We have sunk to such a low position, as to not being able to define a man or woman without accepting great scrutiny. The fields of economics, medicine, biology, science in general, all the hard sciences in fact, and fake ‘virology,’ have been taken over by those with but one final agenda; that is to control all and control the world. The so-called hard sciences are no longer hard sciences, as any conclusion can be changed at will, or manipulated to fit any agenda, relegating all to a position of confusion and soft science in the pure sense of the definition. In other words, nothing is accepted as fact except fiction.

It is time to only seek truth, and it is time to shun all else. It is time to protect and embrace what little tradition and real history we have left. It is time to expose nonsense as nonsense, instead of attempting to force all to accept the unacceptable. A man is a man, and a woman is a woman. One cannot simply snap their fingers and become something they are not. Real biology cannot be ignored, nor can it be altered to suit the current winds of idiocy.

It is also important to understand that promoting hope without hard factual evidence to support it, can be more harmful than not. Good news is fantastic, and optimism is wonderful, but pulling it out of thin air in the midst of the most heinous situation ever to face mankind, is not a solution, but a detriment to society in general, especially given the very weak, pathetic, and politically correct mindset of this worldwide herd of sheep. This attitude breeds even more apathy.

Many millions, and quite possibly billions of people, could die given our current circumstances and the obvious horrors we might encounter in the near future.

These include bioweapon injections, massive food shortages being purposely structured and implemented by the ruling ‘elites,’ state-produced energy shortages, threats of war, (including civil war) back-to-back false flag events meant to create mass fear, martial law, and monitoring of all aspects of every individual’s life and movement.

Social credit scores are coming, digitization and monetary control are being pursued aggressively, and almost every part of life in the near future is planned to be subject to the nonsense of fake manmade (common man) ‘climate change’ which is the elephant in the room, and the basis of the drive for global depopulation and total control by the few.

All those who seem to be coming to their senses, and supposedly ‘waking up,’ will not be a factor in any quest for freedom and independence, unless they speak out, practice open dissent, and say no to any and all state propaganda and mandates; now and in the future. In fact, remaining indifferent in these times is not only counterproductive but is in fact precisely what your masters desire. Saying you are awake and questioning reality is completely irrelevant if action is not taken.

Thinking things are wrong is not enough, one must act on what they know to be right in order to change the status quo. This does not require aggression at this point, but it does require courage. Without courage by the masses; without standing against what we know to be wrong, we are all doomed to a life of serfdom.

Do not be controlled, and do not allow sanity to be challenged, for all our lives depend on stopping this monster called the state.

“If you aren’t destroying your enemies, it’s because you have been conquered and assimilated, you do not even have an idea of who your enemies are. You have been brainwashed into believing you are your own enemy, and you are set against yourself. The enemy is laughing at you as you tear yourself to pieces. That is the most effective warfare an enemy can launch on his foes: confounding them.”

~ Bangambiki Habyarimana, Pearls Of Eternity

Our New Normal: Inflation, Poverty, Starvation, Economic Collapse, Fascism, Marxism, Communism, and Murder

“So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men.”

~ Voltaire

The gullibility of man it seems has no bounds, for if it did, how could so many be so blind? As I reflect on the past 19 months or so, it is quite alarming to understand the scope of this scam called a ‘pandemic,’ and how this entire country (and the world) have embraced lies, deception, and tyranny of such magnitude. Mass murder at the hands of the state has already begun, but with the rollout of deadly and poisonous injections purposely mislabeled as ‘vaccines,’ the murder of large numbers that is democide, will be evident among this entire population for years to come. The perpetrators of this genocidal takeover of society are now coming after all children and will attempt to poison as many as possible with their ‘vaccines’ over the course of this year and next.

Only a nation of pathetic cowardly fools would allow such an abominable fate for their own defenseless offspring. This type of behavior indicates a total lack of intellect and mass ignorance of reality. It also indicates widespread indifference, which is incarnate of a sick and immoral society.   

So, it seems that the so-called “new normal” of totalitarian rule over a slave-like society, is not just the fault of those who wish to rule over us, but more so the people at large for allowing this to happen without proper resistance. Blaming the enemy is easy, but accepting blame for self is avoided at all costs, and this attitude is even worse than that of tyrants. It is expected that the evil among us who are the ruling class exists, but the evil of mass apathy can never be accepted or excused.

In the course of the past few months, this country’s citizens have fully acquiesced to the will of a totalitarian regime, and in the process, have laid bare their weaknesses due to unfounded fear. Many believe there is safety in numbers, but that is only the mindset of herd animals, not humans. By voluntarily allowing for the death and destruction of part of the herd, the rest survive to live one more day, but when people accept this attitude, they also have to accept the death and destruction of their family, friends, and neighbors as normal for survival. If that is the case, it seems that the evolution of the human species is going backward, and that is exactly what collectivism is meant to accomplish.

With this comes the consequences of non-action, and under these circumstances, those consequences are always at the discretion of the tyrants. What has happened to date should be enough for anyone to see the folly of having confidence in any state or nation. What began with lockdowns and quarantines, led to business closings, job loss, extreme stress, supply line disruption, shortages, higher prices for goods and services, (inflation), and of course economic chaos. This in turn led to much more poverty, despair, and starvation, setting the stage for the next phase of this takeover. By this time, the people should have recognized the totalitarian nature of what was going on, but alas, they remained obedient and passive and watched as their world was decimated.

In order to see the writing on the wall, one must seek out and accept the truth, regardless of the risk involved in doing so. To avoid the truth in favor of hiding from reality, hoping that someone else will ‘fix’ things, is exactly what all tyrannical rulers seek in the populations they are attempting to control. It is my expressed opinion, that the timing of this takeover coup was based fully on the fact that the master class knew that the general population was too afraid, too dependent, and too apathetic to fight back against this dictatorial authoritarianism that had been planned for decades. The timing of this was genius because the masses acted in exactly the manner desired.

While no such thing as ‘Covid-19’ actually exists and has never been identified, the real threat that is the real pandemic had been held aside for just the right moment, and early this year the ‘vaccine’ pandemic was released. The ‘vaccine’ is the bio-weapon, and the so-called non-existent variants of a non-existent virus, are the result of the deadly ‘vaccines.’ In other words, the ‘vaccine’ is the pandemic, and all those who have voluntarily taken the injections will be the victims of this staged pandemic. Once the deaths from these jabs reach unprecedented numbers, and they will, the rest of society who have not succumbed to the idiocy of taking such a dangerous concoction will be blamed. In effect, all will have been targeted by the criminal state, whether they got the injection or not. The ‘vaccinated’ group will be sick and dying, while the unvaccinated group will be hunted by the state. This is why this society has already been divided by stealth in order to pit those vaccinated against those who are unvaccinated; a sinister plot meant to solidify control of both groups.

This is a communistic takeover attempt, that has all the elements of Fascism, Marxism, and Communism rolled into one. It is the most dangerous time in history for the inhabitants of this planet, as it is an attempt to achieve a globalized takeover of all in order to convert to one technocratically controlled system, where there are an ‘elite’ few’ at the top, their enforcers and corporate partners below, including government, with the rest being a slave class known as the proletariat.  

While this ‘pandemic’ is thought to be about a mystery virus, it is not, as the virus narrative is just the tool being used to accomplish the real agenda, which has its roots based in the guise of ‘sustainable development’ marketed through the idiocy of man-made climate change. This has been fully outlined in the UN’s Agenda 21 and Agenda 30, and in the aptly named “Great Reset’ agenda described by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. In reality, it has but one objective, and that is to achieve total global governance and universal control overall. To be successful in this venture, many hundreds of millions, or more likely billions, will need to be murdered. The ‘vaccines’ are the tools of murder, so avoidance of these injections at all costs is imperative.

This is not a new threat, but it has been carefully manipulated to occur at this time in order to coincide with the people’s ignorance and indifference, their prepared division, their weakness and dependence on the state, and therefore their cowardice in the face of adversity. This ‘vaccine’ is the key to success for the evil and criminal rulers, so the fewer of us that take these witches to brew, the more of us who will be able to fight back against this heinous attempt to destroy humanity. Our only hope is to remain non-compliant, to disobey every order, and to abolish the current governing system that has assumed dictatorial powers with voluntary cooperation from the masses.

“The opposite of love does not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it’s indifference.”

American Schools Are Fantastically Depressing Places Sending A Clear Message: ‘Enter here and be FOREVER psychologically brutalized’

The phoniest trope in American life goes like this: We must find the cause of X so that it never happens again. Of course, it will happen again. We only pretend that the cause is a mystery. Let’s count the ways that school massacres happen.

American schools are fantastically depressing places. They are designed to look like medium-security prisons and insecticide factories. They send the message: Enter here and be psychologically brutalized. They are too big, overwhelmingly alienating, ugly, and devoid of visible symbolism signaling the value of being human. The interiors of the schools are designed for the convenience of janitors, with hard surfaces of tile and linoleum that can be hosed down easily like the quarters of zoo animals. Children act accordingly.

The “facilities,” as we call them, are deployed in the illegible landscape of a demolition derby, separated from all the other activities of daily life, which themselves have reached a culminating state of meaninglessness: big-box shopping, national chain franchise food installations, strip malls of empty storefronts, parking lot wastelands, nothing that will excite a child’s imagination with emotions other than bewilderment, anxiety, and aversion.

The “teaching” that supposedly goes on in schools is a broken remnant of preparation for an economy that no longer exists. We’re no longer a society of people who do things, but rather a society of people to whom things are done, many of them harmful, humiliating, and arbitrary. America’s demoralized teaching corps is so unhinged by their own anomie that they resort to imposing sadistic fantasies on the children in their charge.

Thus, all the inappropriate curricula around adult preoccupations with sex, such as the Drag Queen Story Hour, for which mentally ill men are invited to act-out impersonations of women as monsters for young people who can’t possibly be expected to make sense of the spectacle. (I suspect that even six-year-olds, hard-wired to function as successful animals in this world, understand it as some kind of affront to reality.) Otherwise, American teachers are out of ideas and are themselves damaged by the same forces in a culture that they are now asked to direct.

Similar to Morphine: The Best Natural Painkiller that Grows in Your Backyard
Wild Lettuce is also Known as Opium Lettuce. For a good reason. While it doesn’t contain any opiates, it has similar side effects when used – it acts directly on the central nervous system (CNS) to lessen the feeling of pain, just like morphine. Watch this video and learn a quick recipe (wild lettuce extract) for the best natural painkiller. Over 23 million Patriots have already seen It. Gives you a quick, easy way to make your own life-saving painkiller, ready for when you need it. Click Here To Discover More.

America has become a malfunctioning pageant without feasible roles that children can realistically project themselves into. What ten-year-old longs to become the Burger King fry-o-later boss in a brown apron and an asinine cardboard crown? Rather, they are prompted to aspire to become sports star millionaires, of which there are perhaps fewer than 5,000 positions in a land of 340-million. By age twelve, they probably comprehend the unlikelihood of that outcome, or of becoming the next Kardashian… or Spiderman. (Superheroes are supplied by the entertainment cartels to occupy the imaginative realm of children because American culture is bereft of reality-based roles worth aspiring to.)

In this tumult of cultural impoverishment, psychotic grandiosity creeps in. Be big if you can’t be anything else. Hence, one achievable role for young persons in American life is a mass murderer. It is a way of becoming important, of having an effect on other people and society in general. Your name may be forgotten, but the act itself will endure in the collective memory of a people. It will be some kind of a mark in history, even better remembered, perhaps, than whoever played third-base for the Atlanta Braves in 1994… or the woman who once capered down the red carpet at the Oscars in a dress fashioned on a slaughtered swan.

The mayhem unleashed in a school shooting is just the rectified essence of the manifold derangements in our national life. Everything is out-of-whack, including our perception of what’s going on and what it means. There is almost nothing left of childhood in this land, in the way of young, unformed creatures assisted by adults who love them into a future worth being part of. We have forgotten how to be grateful for coming into this world at all, leaving us unworthy of being here. The quality of virtue, meaning that some things and some doings are recognizably better than others, was deceitfully replaced by the equity of nothing being allowed to be better than anything else. Truth and beauty have gone outlaw. Bad faith and wickedness rule, led by a Party of Chaos. So, really, what do you expect? And what do you deserve?

Ending this article, I highly recommend this book to everyone. 300 pages, color, paperback. The Lost Book of Remedies is helping Americans achieve medical self-sufficiency even in the darkest times using the time-tested methods of our grandparents without spending lots of money on toxic drugs and without side effects. A great asset when doctors and hospitals won’t be available any more given the current situation. You may not be Claude Davis, but you can make use of his procedures and techniques to increase your chances of survival!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is bor.jpg

Before you go to bed tonight, do this ONE “stupidly simple” Greek ritual to reverse your diabetes…This diabetes-reversing trick was previously known ONLY to the inhabitants of a small, barely populated Greek island, 4800 miles from home… check it out here.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is VIDEODIABET.jpg

Are They Really Out to Get Me?—The Dysfunctional And Parasitical Nature Of Your Government

Libertarians and others who seek to be left alone to run their own lives habitually ask themselves the above question regarding their government.

So, what’s the answer? Are they out to get you? Well, unfortunately, the answer isn’t a simple “yes” or “no.” In fact, it’s “yes” and “no.”

The secret to understanding a government’s intentions is that there’s no unified overall objective, sentiment, or approach to dealing with the private sector. Quite the opposite. With any government, it couldn’t be more fragmented or dysfunctional.

At the very lowest level of any government is the civil service, which is, in any country, a catch-all for all those people who are so lacking in ability and imagination that they’d be unlikely to hold down a job in the private sector. Moreover, their level of motivation is likely to be so low that their dysfunction tends to coincide with extreme inefficiency.

To test this out, one only has to visit the local Department of Motor Vehicles or a similar agency that does little except charge fees and waste time in order to provide you with a permit, which, were it not required, you could happily do without.

Most anyone, in observing the individual behind the counter, would observe the glassy stare and recognize that, even though this person spends each working day behind this counter and may have been doing so for years, he or she takes virtually no interest in your personal concerns and, if you have questions, tends to find them a nuisance and an interruption in the endless drudgery of issuing paperwork.

Hence the image above. Here we have a pilot in Canada who, when being presented with a computer-driven list of tail letters that were authorized for him to choose from, immediately laughed when he saw the above letters on the list. He then went up to the counter, having circled the ones he chose, and the clerk processed the application brainlessly, without it even registering in his head what the letters suggested.

Later, when the pilot had the letters emblazoned on his fuselage, it might not have been unlikely that an airport supervisor, seeing them 10 inches high on the side of the plane, raised an objection, at which time the pilot proudly produced his paperwork.

As most anyone in the private sector can attest, as soon as the paperwork is presented, the civil servant in question simply says, “Oh,” then nods and lets you go on your way.

But, looking at this more deeply, what we’re witnessing is that that percentage of the population who are (once again) lacking in ability and imagination are easy to program by the government to become automatons—that even if something strikes them as being somehow incorrect, as long as it has the State stamp of approval, it’s just fine.

And, so, at the lower level of government, we have those who are not “out to get us”; they are merely borderline useless and have ended up with jobs in which that deficiency will not get them fired. They are, therefore, merely “in the way.”

As we go up the chain, however, where those in government are somewhat more ambitious, we find a greater desire to control. The closer we get to the higher echelons, the more they truly are “out to get you.”

Why should this be? And why should it be that those the higher-ups tend to hate the most are those who are self-motivated, responsible, self-reliant, and imaginative?

Well, unfortunately, the answer is simple. It’s because those are the character traits that they lack. I’m sorry to have to say that in my many years of working directly with politicians and heads of governments, virtually all of them were highly evolved civil-servant types. They had more drive, more guile, and larger egos than the lower-level bureaucrats but were just as parasitical and just as lacking in character traits that would make them productive people.

With these individuals, yes, they are out to get you. First, if they recognize that you possess the traits that would make you productive, they will be highly jealous and suspicious of you. Second, they will understand that since you are productive and they are not, they must find a means by which they can use you as a cash cow, to be milked as much as possible and as often as possible.

Their purpose, therefore, is to regulate, control, and tax you in every way possible, and in this they are, quite simply, predators. They may be Tory or Labour, Republican or Democrat, but they are predators nonetheless and, as such, are a genuine threat to both your freedom and your well-being.

Of course, all politicians play the game of party politics, doing all in their power to convince the electorate that they and their party are dramatically different from the opposing party, presenting their own party as “the good guys,” and the opposing party as “the bad guys.”

However, they are, as Judge Andrew Napolitano has repeatedly stated, merely “two wings of the same bird of prey.”

Significantly, as both the bottom level and top-level are separated by many other layers of bureaucracy, and as their common character traits are inability, dysfunction, etc., there is no cohesive set of principles upon which a government operates. Its purposes are control and usurpation, and they’re backed by an imbroglio of confused and self-contradictory legislation and an increasingly large body of enforcement agencies.

Although the individuals within these agencies tend to be incompetent and dysfunctional, they do tend to remain loyal to the whole. They may not get along with each other, work toward a unified set of goals, or even have the same beliefs. They do, however, tend to do as they’re told and blindly support the State, above all else.

Once all the above is understood, the individual may do as this pilot has done. He has grasped the dysfunction and parasitical nature of his government and has used their own computer-generated registration code to express his reaction to “authority.”

More to the point, he has used their laws, their bureaucracy to express it legally.

This is an important point. Each individual, essentially, has three choices. He can either go along with those lesser beings who seek to control his life, or he can rebel and possibly be incarcerated for his efforts, or he can become creative and recognize that the laws and regulations of his country are a confusing mess, written by incompetent people, and do all he can to assert his independence, legally.

He can and should do everything in his power to operate his life as though he’s not owned by the government of his home country or any other government, for that matter.

Wherever a government tries to control the ownership of its real estate through taxation, it might seek out a jurisdiction that has no property tax. If they try to tax his income, he might seek out a country that has no income tax. If they try to restrict his migration, he might seek second citizenship that does not restrict him.

Freedom is not merely a vague historical idea or an excuse to celebrate with firecrackers once a year; it’s a lifetime pursuit and should be taken on as such. The pilot in question has made an initial stab at it. Hopefully he, along with you, the reader, will make it a central facet of his life’s work.

Nuclear War? Thank God That There Is No Justice In This World

The Russians are a weird people. For some reason, known only to their bizarre selves, they object to German invasions of their country. And not only that: they have the inexplicable habit of strenuously opposing another such eventuality.

One might well have thought otherwise. After all, the Germans bring with them in their wake all sorts of salutary benefits: law and order, good government, peace (as long as their orders are followed), world-class beer, wiener schnitzel, sauerkraut, great pretzels, luxury automobiles, magnificent music (it is hard to beat Johann Sebastian Bach!). What more could the Russians want?

Any rational country would be more than happy that the Germans offered them such benefits, not once but twice during the last century. Do you think the Russians were appreciative? No. They are a bunch of ingrates! Instead of being open for a third “visit” by the Germans, almost their entire foreign policy was dedicated to the principle of “never again.” It sometimes seemed that it consisted of little more than to preclude a third benevolent appearance across the borders of their friends, the Germans.

Thus, they tried to set up a cordon sanitaire, a buffer zone, between them and their German buddies to the west.

NATO was set up to confront supposed Soviet expansion in the westward direction. Yes, the USSR did engage in this defensive maneuver, aimed at keeping their German friends at bay. But then the Soviet Union ended. That would have been the perfect time to disband both NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Instead, NATO kept creeping, sometimes jogging, in an eastward direction. Given its past history of invasions, the Russians strongly objected. They have not been behindhand in making this desire, this fervent wish of theirs (remember, they are a weird folk), explicit.

At one time the Ukrainian government was more or less friendly to its neighbor to the east. But then, thanks to a coup d’etat, organized by NATO (guess which country is a prominent member of that organization. If you said Germany, go to the head of the class) that democratically elected government was overthrown. It was replaced by one that had an entirely different attitude toward Russia. So much so that it applied to NATO for membership. This would have meant that enemy weapons of mass destruction would have been placed at the very doorstep of Russia. Patience finally wore thin and Russia said: “no mas” to this policy.

If there were any justice in the world, Russia never would have entered Ukraine. Instead, they would have declared war on all the member nations of NATO, all of them without exception. Thank God that there is no justice in this world. We should thank our lucky stars that Putin is a mensch. Otherwise, the very existence of the entire human race would have been put at high risk. Even now, the chances of a nuclear Armageddon are perhaps as strong as they ever were, since the Cuban missile crisis. (Amazingly, the US vociferously objected to the placing of enemy weaponry 90 miles from its shores.)

What has been the reaction of the US to the present blow-back against its decades-long policy? Unfortunately, both Democrats and Republicans, with but a few rare exceptions, have been rattling sabers; calling for all sorts of harm to the Russians. Do these people not realize what danger they place on all the rest of us, to say nothing of themselves, their children, and grandchildren? Have they not yet learned the lesson that a nuclear conflagration can ruin our entire day?

What should happen now, if sanity is to return? Peace should once again reign, after a complete ceasefire. All troops should return to their home country. No other nation should supply Ukraine with weapons of any type or variety. This country should cease and desist from its attempt to join NATO. That mischievous, nasty and malicious organization should be disbanded and salt sowed where once it stood.

The Last Days of the Covidien Cult

This isn’t going to be pretty, folks. The downfall of a death cult rarely is. There is going to be wailing and gnashing of teeth, incoherent fanatical jabbering, mass deleting of embarrassing tweets. There’s going to be a veritable tsunami of desperate rationalizing, strenuous denying, shameless blame-shifting, and other forms of ass-covering, as suddenly former Covidien Cult members make a last-minute break for the jungle before the fully-vaxxed-and-boosted “Safe and Effective Kool-Aid” servers get to them.

Yes, that’s right, as I’m sure you’ve noticed, the official Covid narrative is finally falling apart, or is being hastily disassembled, or historically revised, right before our eyes. The “experts” and “authorities” are finally acknowledging that the “Covid deaths” and “hospitalization” statistics are artificially inflated and totally unreliable (which they have been from the very beginning), and they are admitting that their miracle “vaccines” don’t work (unless you change the definition of the word “vaccine”), and that they have killed a few people, or maybe more than a few people, and that lockdowns were probably “a serious mistake.”

I am not going to bother with further citations. You can surf the Internet as well as I can. The point is, the “Apocalyptic Pandemic” PSYOP has reached its expiration date. After almost two years of mass hysteria over a virus that causes mild-to-moderate common-cold or flu-like symptoms (or absolutely no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, people’s nerves are shot. We are all exhausted. Even the Covidien cultists are exhausted. And they are starting to abandon the cult en masse.

It was always mostly just a matter of time. As Klaus Schwab said, “the pandemic represent[ed] a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.”

It isn’t over, but that window is closing, and our world has not been “reimagined” and “reset,” not irrevocably, not just yet. Clearly, GloboCap underestimated the potential resistance to the Great Reset, and the time it would take to crush that resistance. And now the clock is running down, and the resistance isn’t crushed … on the contrary, it is growing. And there is nothing GloboCap can do to stop it, other than go openly totalitarian, which it can’t, as that would be suicidal. As I noted in a recent column:

“New Normal totalitarianism — and any global-capitalist form of totalitarianism — cannot display itself as totalitarianism, or even authoritarianism. It cannot acknowledge its political nature. In order to exist, it must not exist. Above all, it must erase its violence (the violence that all politics ultimately comes down to) and appear to us as an essentially beneficent response to a legitimate ‘global health crisis’ …”

The simulated “global health crisis” is, for all intents and purposes, over. This means that GloboCap has screwed the pooch. The thing is, if you intend to keep the masses whipped up into a mindless frenzy of anus-puckering paranoia over an “apocalyptic global pandemic,” at some point, you have to produce an actual apocalyptic global pandemic. Faked statistics and propaganda will carry you for a while, but eventually, people are going to need to experience something at least resembling an actual devastating worldwide plague, in reality, not just on their phones and TVs.

Also, GloboCap seriously overplayed its hand with the miracle “vaccines.” Covidien cultists really believed that the “vaccines” would protect them from infection. Epidemiology experts like Rachel Maddow assured them that they would:

“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person,” Maddow said on her show the evening of March 29, 2021. “A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else,” she added with a shrug. “It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.”

And now they are all sick with … well, a cold, basically, or are “asymptomatically infected,” or whatever. And they are looking at a future in which they will have to submit to “vaccinations” and “boosters” every three or four months to keep their “compliance certificates” current, in order to be allowed to hold a job, attend a school, or eat at a restaurant, which, OK, hardcore cultists are fine with, but there are millions of people who have been complying, not because they are delusional fanatics who would wrap their children’s heads in cellophane if Anthony Fauci ordered them to, but purely out of “solidarity,” or convenience, or herd instinct, or … you know, cowardice.

Many of these people (i.e., the non-fanatics) are starting to suspect that maybe what we “tin-foil-hat-wearing, Covid-denying, anti-vax, conspiracy-theorist extremists” have been telling them for the past 22 months might not be as crazy as they originally thought. They are back-pedaling, rationalizing, revising history, and just making up all kinds of self-serving bullshit, like how we are now in “a post-vaccine world,” or how “the Science has changed,” or how “Omicron is different,” in order to avoid being forced to admit that they’re the victims of a GloboCap PSYOP and the worldwide mass hysteria it has generated.

Which … fine, let them tell themselves whatever they need to for the sake of their vanity, or their reputations as investigative journalists, celebrity leftists, or Twitter revolutionaries. If you think these “recovering” Covidien Cult members are ever going to publicly acknowledge all the damage they have done to society, and to people and their families, since March 2020, much less apologize for all the abuse they heaped onto those of us who have been reporting the facts … well, they’re not. They are going to spin, equivocate, rationalize, and lie through their teeth, whatever it takes to convince themselves and their audience that, when the shit hit the fan, they didn’t click heels and go full “Good German.”

Give these people hell if you need to. I feel just as angry and betrayed as you do. But let’s not lose sight of the ultimate stakes here. Yes, the official narrative is finally crumbling, and the Covidien Cult is starting to implode, but that does not mean that this fight is over. GloboCap and their puppets in government are not going to cancel the whole “New Normal” program, pretend the last two years never happened, and gracefully retreat to their lavish bunkers in New Zealand and their mega-yachts.

Totalitarian movements and death cults do not typically go down gracefully. They usually go down in a gratuitous orgy of wanton, nihilistic violence as the cult or movement desperately attempts to maintain its hold over its wavering members and defend itself from encroaching reality. And that is where we are at the moment … or where we are going to be very short.

Cities, states, and countries around the world are pushing ahead with implementing the New Normal biosecurity society, despite the fact that there is no longer any plausible justification for it. Austria is going ahead with forced “vaccination.” Germany is preparing to do the same. France is rolling out a national segregation system to punish “the Unvaccinated.” Greece is fining “unvaccinated” pensioners. Australia is operating “quarantine camps.” Scotland. Italy. Spain. The Netherlands. New York City. San Francisco. Toronto. The list goes on, and on, and on.

I don’t know what is going to happen. I’m not an oracle. I’m just a satirist. But we are getting dangerously close to the point where GloboCap will need to go full-blown fascist if they want to finish what they started. If that happens, things are going to get very ugly. I know, things are already ugly, but I’m talking about a whole different kind of ugly. Think Jonestown, or Hitler’s final days in the bunker, or the last few months of the Manson Family.

That is what happens to totalitarian movements and death cults once the spell is broken and their official narratives fall apart. When they go down, they try to take the whole world with them. I don’t know about you, but I’m hoping we can avoid that. From what I have heard and read, it isn’t much fun.

ALIEN A.I.—ROLLING BACK THE DOMAIN OF THE GODS

Planet Earth is home to some spectacular relics from bygone eras, constructions that seem to defy the technological capabilities of their time either because they’re too big, too heavy, or too complex.

As such, some suggest the ancient builders of the Egyptian pyramids, the Nazca Lines, and others were following an extraterrestrial instruction manual. Perhaps the hands that crafted these sites weren’t really of this world.

It’s a compelling proposal that aliens have visited Earth. It is even fun to speculate about alien technology capable of constructing some of the many mysterious wonders found on Easter Island or Egypt.

After all, humans are on the threshold of expanding our reach in space, and the science of exobiology, studying the multiverse, and panpsychism are now the new topics of discussion as the technocracy pushes us into the new paradigm.

The so-called technocracy within the global power elite is one of the most studied human subcultures ever. However, the studies are the most nebulous, because these power brokers of high technology have plans for you and me and future manipulations of the world are being delegated.

It is important to point out that the technocrats are patient and are continually working to bring forward a remarkable machine capable of solving problems that man can’t do now.

Sometime in the next 20 to 30 years, computer hardware and software will create artificial general intelligence which will exceed humans in its capabilities in general ways.

Many people can’t comprehend beyond a computer that does small tasks like calculating numbers for bookkeeping or arranging and organizing schedules.

Our technology today has become part of our social strata; we are using it for communication and research. It has been a tool that has assisted us in raising our awareness.

The new AI that is being proposed will be for science and business to share an open playing field away from the common user and will be used to enhance creativity and find solutions to problems that humans have been unable to do, such as human cancer, biological aging, space-time travel, and just about anything else you can imagine.

The technology is moving so quickly that there are some people who are beginning to question the origins of such advanced technology.

In 1920 a film was released in Germany called ALGOL: Tragedy of Power. The plot dealt with an evil alien creature named ALGOL. ALGOL was a visitor from the demon star of the same name. He appears to be a poor miner and gives him superior technology.

It is a free energy device that has indescribable power. ALGOL told the man that anyone who possessed it could become master of the world.

The film was released two years after World War I. The story was the first of its kind anywhere. It was probably the first time a story about alien intervention and secret technologies had ever graced the screen. It was considered at the time to be a remarkable film dealing with the occult. The very idea of an industrialist with a secret technology used to enslave a people was an ominous foreshadowing of things to come.

As knowledge and understanding have grown about our place in the universe and the multiverse, notions of other intelligent life in space have emerged. We are also aware of the concept of alien intelligence and life well-rooted here on planet Earth. The thought of alien life and even investigations in Antarctica have given scientists the inspiration to seek out a new life on icy moons like Enceladus and Europa.

Humans have taken a long time to begin to understand sentience and self-awareness in other species here on Earth, and to begin to appreciate non-human intelligence from insect colonies, to crows, elephants, dolphins, and many more Earth-based lifeforms.

Science is now breaking with tradition and is now leaping into philosophical questions about consciousness and whether the universe and all that it has produced has some form of consciousness. With this emergence of the new paradigm and the more open scientific method, humanity seems to be rolling back the domain of the gods.

What I mean is that in the past, gods answered our unknowns. Now with new scientific discoveries, there are fewer unknowns.

With these discoveries, science is whittling away the need for godly intercessors and external saviors. While many worry about aliens being the new demons, perhaps there should be a light shown on the technocracy that is taking away the need for God.

While many scientists are having the final word on multiverses that prove the existence of God—technology is busily trying to find its singularity.

Transhumanists believe the singularity will be jump-started by extremely rapid technological and scientific changes. These changes will be so fast, and so profound, that every aspect of our society will be transformed, from our bodies and families to our governments and economies.

Talking about singularity is a paradox because it is an attempt to imagine something that is, unimaginable to people living today. But that hasn’t stopped hundreds of science fiction writers and futurists from opening our minds to it.

We need to keep in mind that the new technology is no longer new – it is reaching its suicidal adolescence and soon it will mature and, in its growth, slowly replace the need for mankind to think for itself.

Lately, it now seems that humans have neglected to study native intelligence here on Earth, we are now catching up while at the same time peering out in the surrounding Universe searching for evidence of intelligence elsewhere.

In the latest news, the U.S. Congress has authorized NASA to spend $10 million on the search for alien intelligence among the stars. This is money welcomed by those who have been doing this type of work for decades.

Timing is everything when seeking alien intelligence. Human civilization is only recently technically savvy. It is only a century since we began making the Universe beyond Earth aware of our technological existence. We started with radio, then television, and now rockets, satellites, and humans in near-Earth orbit.

If there are aliens out there observing us, then they most certainly are aware of our technology, and we can only imagine what kind of technology they have.

In H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds, his Martians evolved in a nearby world producing biology based on a trinary model. Martian symmetry came in threes. Martians were three-legged and three-eyed.

They had war machines called Tripods, which appeared to have a symbiotic relationship with the Martians. It was almost like the pilots of these Tripods transferred their consciousness into their machines.

Now consider alien species that develop advanced technology that becomes sentient. We are talking about artificial intelligence capable of exceeding the mental capacity of its creators. This is the concern expressed by many humans here on Earth who in watching the advancement of AI, fear the technology will exceed human intelligence in the very near future.

People like Elon Musk warn us that AI will outlast its creators if we don’t manage its development properly.

An alien AI may already have achieved immortality elsewhere in the Universe. That AI may have started off as an assistant to its creators, developed to be a symbiont, and then ultimately have gone on to become capable of harvesting the energy of the Universe to sustain itself. Such an AI would be wholly unrecognizable to us with the advantage of a billion-year head start in its evolution.

Some speculate that such an alien AI would be like a god. AI gods would be omnipresent and invisible. They would be immortal.

One of my favorite stories by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov is “The Last Question.”

The story overlaps science fiction, theology, and philosophy. In the story, something like the internet called Multivacs grows and accumulates universal knowledge. It is something similar to what we now call artificial intelligence.

Humans are to the point where they can ask the Artificial Intelligence anything and the Multivacs give them immediate answers.

There is one question that the Artificial Intelligence won’t answer.

The question is about entropy and it is apparent that humans are beginning to wonder when the world will end, and the universe fades away.

The answer is always the same: “INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.”

Many years go by and someone else decides to ask the ultimate last question. By this point, Multivac’s descendants have all failed to answer.

Finally, a god-like descendant of humanity watches as the stars fade out in space. The matter is ending, and with it, time and space as it’s been known all along.

A representative of the dying humanity asks Multivac’s descendant, the same question before it merges with the eternal AI and disappears. The advanced AI still doesn’t know the answer, but this time, it ponders it even after everything ends.

It reaches a conclusion, finds an answer, but everything is dead.

Finally, this highly advanced Artificial Intelligence in the last gasp gives an answer:

LET THERE BE LIGHT.

It explodes in a blinding light and the cycle happens all over again.

We Have to Talk About Nazism—How Our Times Do Indeed Echo an Earlier Totalitarian Era

My first post in this three-part series, about how the evil that surrounds us has manifested, was about the elite global technocrat class and their distance from the people whose lives they may crush; I noted their lack of belief in, or loyalty to, the nation-state. Added to this toxic mix, I argued, is the certainty of this class of people that they know best about your life.

I made the case in that essay that surrounding us now was a metaphysical, seemingly a Satanic, level of evil.

I am seeking to explain in this series of essays, how otherwise nice people — and indeed Western people, who grew up with post-Enlightenment norms about human rights and the rule of law — can be doing evil now, with whole hearts.

I am asking how they can be suppressing the respiration of children intentionally; how they can be consigning friends and colleagues to eat in the street like outcasts, or sending cops to arrest a woman and terrify a nine-year-old child, whose crimes were that they tried to visit the Museum of Natural History in New York without “papers”?

How could “nice” people in the humane West, can have been put on the agenda in Washington State just two weeks ago, plans to detain those exposed to a “contagious disease” in forcible quarantine, without charge or trial, and dependent on a court order and good behavior to get out?

All of this is happening right now in America – -in the land of people who, since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, have had the principle of equality governing human relations as a matter of law; a nation that had passed laws against the abuse of or corporal punishment of children in public schools in the 1970s in virtually every state; and a people who have been raised in a culture of freedom and civility compared with lawless or totalitarian regimes, that led them, for the most part, to be, on the scale of decency to cruelty, until two years ago, very decent people.

How could good people be going along with this?

There are lessons from history that we have to learn, or re-learn, and quickly.

Some leaders and commentators (including myself) have passionately and publicly been comparing these years, 2020-2022, in the West and in Australia, to the early years of the Nazi leadership. Though we face criticism for doing so, I won’t be silenced about this. The similarities must urgently be addressed.

People need to reread their Nazi history. They are getting it wrong in demanding, ‘How dare you compare?”

While the popular imagination of the Nazi era is familiar with deaths camps, and think of them when Nazi policy is invoked, the fact is that many years led up to that horror. Germany invaded Poland in 1939. The extermination camps were established years into the Nazi drama: 1941. [https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/how-and-why/how/creation-of-extermination-camps/]. Dr. Josef Mengele, “The Angel of Death,” began his medical experiments in Auschwitz after 1943. [http://www.auschwitz.org/en/history/medical-experiments/josef-mengele]

No-one sensible is talking about comparing what we are living through now to those years and those horrors.

Rather, the vivid similarities between our moment in the West since 2020, and the earliest years of Nazi Germany’s civil society policies, are to the years 1931-33, when so many vicious norms and policies were set in place. But these were often culturally or professionally policed, rather than being policed by camp patrols. That’s the point that better-informed analysts of these similarities are making.

That is to say, during these years, mass societal cruelty, and a two-tier society itself that perpetuated this cruelty was built up and policed, as today, by polite civil society institutions tasked with snarling and baring its teeth.

Casual, escalating cruelty, a culture of degradation of the “othered,” and a two-tier society, were built up in those years certainly at the behest of Nazi social policy. But the construction of a world of evil out of what had been a modern civil society, if a fragile one, was also endorsed and even policed by doctors, by medical associations, by journalists, by famous composers and filmmakers, by universities; by neighbors, by teachers, by shopkeepers — for years before the death camp guards were tasked with their own far more heinous cruelty.

Amos Elon’s poignant history, The Pity of it All: A History of Jews in Germany, 1743-1933, reveals how many Jewish civil society leaders warned about the imperceptible shifts day by day in the direction of evil. In 1931, street violence was directed against Jewish storefronts and led to smashed-in windows. In other contexts, Jews were beaten upon leaving synagogues. Commentator Theodor Wolff warned, “This simply cannot continue. All decent people, irrespective of party, must form a common front […]”

So one might say today.

But….but decent people did not do so then, and Wolff’s call to action was to no avail. Elon calls these years “these last spasms of freedom.” [Elon, 387].

Wolff’s publisher told him to “tone down his warnings in the interest of advertising and circulation.” [Elon, 388] Like today, those issuing alarms were suppressed and censored.

As of today, emergency laws were the benchmarks that would allow democracy to collapse. “Hitler wanted full powers like Mussolini’s in Italy,” writes Elon. “He knew exactly what was needed to turn a government into a ‘legal’ dictatorship: emergency powers under Article 48.” [Elon, 389].

See if you notice any echoes here. Currently, forty-seven US states are operating with emergency measures, which suspend or bypass normal legislative checks and balances, including New York, the state in which I am writing. Under emergency measures, pretty much anything can be done.

The fact that people don’t seem to understand that most of the country is living under emergency measures, is what is stunning about our current moment. This is why I keep saying these days that the coup d’etat has already taken place in America. By definition, when you are living under emergency measures, you no longer have a functioning democracy.

In Germany, to move back in time, the demonically intelligent incrementalism of Nazi policy continued. In 1933, the year Adolph Hitler was appointed Chancellor of a new cabinet, Hitler gave his word that “the Nazis would remain a minority in any future cabinet.” [Elon, 391]. Even in 1933, though, some prominent Jews still believed that “nothing can happen to us.” [Elon 391].

But “Theodor Wolff was one of the few who warned that Hitler’s appointment was merely the first stage of a coup d’etat in installments.[Italics mine][…] Wolff predicted that ‘a cabinet whose members have been proclaiming for weeks and months that salvation — by which they mean their own — is at hand, in the form of a coup d’etat, a breach of the constitution, the elimination of the Reichstag, the muzzling of the opposition, and in unbridled dictatorial rule…will do everything in its power to intimidate and silence its opponents.’” [Elon 391].

“For millions of Berliners,” writes Elon, “nothing seemed to have changed at first […] Few seemed aware of the watershed they had just passed” [Elon 391].

“Few seemed aware…”

Let me just summarize where we are right now in America, as well as in the West, in case you have gotten too used to it to see it clearly. I warned at The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot, that democracies usually do not die with a cinematic scene of goose-stepping Brownshirts suddenly in the streets. They tend to die, rather, just as Elon described — incrementally, day by day, collapsing grotesquely in some areas of society and in regards to some institutions, even as other aspects of society and other institutions look and feel, at least superficially, exactly the same as they did before.

Just because the settings are familiar to us now, does not mean that a 1931-like reality, if not yet a 1933-like reality, isn’t upon us.

In this country, citizens are being forced to take their second or third experimental gene-therapy injection, in order to go back to school or to keep their jobs as truckers crossing borders, or as soldiers and sailors and military pilots and hospital workers. [https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2881481/service-members-must-be-vaccinated-or-face-consequences-dod-official-says/]

Millions of other workers just narrowly escaped this coercion; and millions have not escaped this coercive experiment, in effect, upon them, in parts of Europe. [https://apnews.com/article/austrian-parliament-covid-vaccine-mandate-8539164285f87443a8b80a213d2dacc0]

Minors are being forced to submit to this experimental gene therapy simply to keep playing high school basketball or tennis.

Thousands of adverse events are being recorded in VAERS, including deaths shortly after vaccination, but the forcing of injections continues despite their having no effect on transmission, and against all existing laws. [https://vaers.hhs.gov]

Voices of opposition to tyrannical overreach are being censored en masse; payment processors are declining to process funds of entities offering medical therapeutics. “The View,” that formerly cozy group of gals, just called for the censorship of podcaster Joe Rogan. Musician Neil Young also called for music streaming service Spotify to censor Rogan’s “misinformation.” [https://www.wsj.com/articles/neil-youngs-music-is-being-taken-down-by-spotify-after-ultimatum-over-joe-rogan-11643230104] Calls for censorship of opposition voices echo across the internet. Dissident platforms such as Parler have been de-platformed from their hosting services or from their payment processors, a digital version of boycotting businesses. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/03/03/parler-sues-amazon-again-in-wake-of-deplatforming/?sh=58e2c725166d]

Leaders are calling for one group of citizens to be denied health care; in some areas of Canada, leaders have told grocers that it is optional to allow this group to buy food. Children in Canada are being told, “No mask, no voice.” Children as young as two are subjected in New York, by a smiling new Governor, a woman, to facial coverings that restrict their breathing, and that impair their ability to acquire language, bond with other children, and recognize and express emotions.

Certain citizens, set apart as “other,” falsely called infectious and positioned as “unclean,” may not enter buildings or restaurants in New York, in Washington D.C., in San Francisco, in Los Angeles. Everyone is being asked to hate and resent them, and irrationally to blame them for the nation’s predicament.

People are asked to join a cult and offer up their bodies; if they don’t, they are ostracized and denied social life and professional advancement.

Small businesses, restaurants, and movies theaters; small hotels and venues, small real estate holdings, entire livelihoods, are being crushed by arbitrary dicta, by the unrestrained powers of Boards of Health and the CDC to crush whole sectors, and thus to destroy, or in effect to transfer, entire classes of assets from one targeted group into the hands of another group: to institutional investors, or shall we say, to allies of the current oligarchs.

In Washington State, as noted above, proposals were put forward — similar to those that have been enacted in Australia and elsewhere — to detain Americans, and turn the Boards of Health into entities with police powers; to establish militias, in effect, in the service of unelected, unaccountable Boards of Health. US “fact-checkers” claimed that this was not true, but it was true. [https://app.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=246-100-040]

Reports are proliferating of the unvaccinated treated abusively in hospitals, and therapeutics have, it is becoming clear, been withheld via government agencies’ pressure, from an entire population, leading to countless avoidable deaths. A class of therapeutics, monoclonal antibodies, have just been withdrawn by the FDA from ill people’s access [https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-monoclonal-antibody-bamlanivimab]. Medical entities such as the formerly respected Mayo Clinic are being sued because they are refusing treatment to a dying man, for which his wife is begging. [https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2022/01/14/mayo-clinic-lawsuit-to-allow-ivermectin-as-a-treatment-moves-out-of-duval/9120594002/].

What do you call all of this, if not an early Nazi-like set of practices?

In the early years of Nazi policy, as Robert Proctor’s magisterial 1990 Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis points out, it was doctors who were tasked by the State, and given special status and authority, with singling out “life unworthy of life” and elaborating racially-based policies that separated the “clean” and privileged, from the “unclean,” or “degenerate,” and restricted. In 1933, doctors began to sterilize the unfit. As Michael A Grodin, MD, Erin L Miller, BA, and Jonathan Miller, MA, point out, in “The Nazi Physicians as Leaders in Eugenics and ‘Euthanasia’: Lessons for Today”: “A series of recurrent themes arose in Nazi medicine as physicians undertook the mission of cleansing the State: the devaluation and dehumanization of segments of the community, medicalization of social and political problems, training of physicians to identify with the political goals of the government, fear of consequences of refusing to cooperate with civil authority, the bureaucratization of the medical role, and the lack of concern for medical ethics and human rights.”

Half of Germany’s physicians joined the Nazi party.

“The devaluing and dehumanization of segments of the community”….

Proctor shows how medical associations embraced the rise in the status and authority of physicians, and how, then as now, “public health” was the anodyne label under which the early structure of emerging horrors was erected. He shows how doctors led the way.

The author even addresses the “health pass” that was established by Nazi public health policy, a pass that separated those who could participate fully in Nazi society, from those who were singled out for deprivation and disgust.

Proctor tracks how eugenics allowed for increasing arguments, similar to those being resuscitated today, that “useless eaters” or the “unfit” do not deserve food, or are a burden on public resources, and should not be a drag on hospitals, or receive medical care.

Proctor shows what a short slide it was from public health officials identifying “life unworthy of life”, these “useless eaters”, to the same officials using the language of “hygiene” and public safety, to set up the first Nazi euthanasia programs — programs targeting those who were identified as “less than,” or in some way impaired.

Then as now, anodyne language, whether around “public health” or “racial hygiene”, as in the 1930s, or around “public health,” “safety” and “harm reduction,” as today, concealed then, and now conceals, the true nature of what should be a visible, nauseating, daily-spreading evil.

Historians such as Proctor have argued that public health glosses, the invocation of medical authority, and compartmentalization and bureaucratization, permitted evil in the early Nazi past to flourish, in spite of its taking root in what was still supposed to have been a modern civil society.

I’d argue that the same exact things in similar guises, cloaked in similar language, are recurring today.

If we don’t wake up and see exactly where we stand and read back in history quickly about a demonic time that overtly mirrors and in many ways foreshadows where we are — then most of us will be fools, even as some of us are already monsters.

If we don’t forcibly and immediately call out monsters where we see them — where they walk among us — whether they wear nice earrings and sit demurely at the helm of the CDC, or whether they gather in white coats, in all their authority, at the Mayo Clinic, standing between a dying man and his desperate wife — we will fail forever to deserve the blessing of the Constitution, and of the rule of law, that is supposed to be our heritage.

And no doubt, the next chapter will surely be for us, as it was for others in the past, darker still.

George Soros: ‘I Am A God, I Created Everything, I Control America And Hillary Clinton’

George Soros, the billionaire hedge-fund manager and financier of so many things far left, lost nearly $1 billion after becoming bearish after Donald Trump’s election victory in 2016. It would seem that if you’re God you might have a better grip on what the future might hold, but reality does little to keep a demonic narcissist’s ego in check.

And like so many sociopaths running our world, he’s quite honest and upfront about how he views himself.

He is touted by the Left as an international philanthropist, but Soros remains candid about his true charitable tendencies. “I am sort of a deus ex machina,” Soros told the New York Times in 1994. “I am something unnatural. I’m very comfortable with my public persona because it is one I have created for myself. It represents what I like to be as distinct from what I really am. You know, in my personal capacity I’m not actually a selfless philanthropic person. I’ve very much self-centered.”

George Soros’ god-complex when paired with his ungodly amount of wealth, makes him a nemesis to those who resist his idea of a one-world government.  He has been directly involved in many schemes to alter the balance of power and create the world into what he deems fit.

By funding Soros’ Open Societies Foundation as well as Mr. Soros himself are funding strategies to encourage participation in the electoral process among those groups most likely to vote for leftest candidates.  With the added words we have an accurate statement that exposes Soros’ motives and agenda.

“The following four goals form the scaffolding of U.S. Programs’ work,” the guide states. “1. An American democracy strengthened through increased meaningful participation, inclusive practice, and accountability.” The third strategic goal expands upon this, calling for “Full political, economic, and civic participation of immigrants and communities of color by dismantling the barriers and strengthening the conduits to opportunity.”

On the world stage, “Globalist George Soros is meddling in the nations around the world, forcing them to take in Muslim refugees, so that the nations will change to fit his brand of what the world should look like.

Moreover, according to Soros, the Muslim migrants must be allowed to choose where they will settle. Most currently travel to Germany and Western Europe where social benefits are available.

Muslim migration “has been the biggest engine of demographic growth in the EU as a whole since the mid-1990s,” a report issued by the EU’s Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development states. “It is about to become the only one.”

 “I fancied myself as some kind of god …” he wrote. “If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.“ When asked by Britain’s Independent newspaper to elaborate on that statement, Soros doubled down: “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.“Since I began to live it out. Those unfamiliar with Soros would probably dismiss that claim as nothing more than the typical blathering of an irrelevant madman. But those who have followed his career and sociopolitical endeavors realize that while he may be mad, he is a mad billionaire, and billionaires tend not to be irrelevant.

Soros freely admits he pulls the puppet strings and holds the purse strings too, by his account, he is “god”.

Sociopaths and psychopaths can be quite difficult to spot. Outwardly they can appear normal or even charming. But underneath their well-crafted veneers, they lack conscience and empathy and are top manipulators. There is a difference between these two antisocial personalities.

The terms “psychopath” and “sociopath” are often used interchangeably, but in correct parlance a “sociopath” refers to a person with antisocial tendencies that are ascribed to social or environmental factors, whereas psychopathic traits are more innate, though a chaotic or violent upbringing may tip the scales for those already predisposed to behave psychopathically. Both constructs are most closely represented in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as Antisocial Personality Disorder. Brain anatomy, genetics, and a person’s environment may all contribute to the development of psychopathic traits.

Here are the top 20 traits of psychopaths according to The Hare Psychopathy Checklist, which is a diagnostic tool to determine if someone is on the psychopathy spectrum.

  • pathological lying
  • glib and superficial charm
  • grandiose sense of self
  • need for stimulation
  • cunning and manipulative
  • lack of remorse or guilt
  • shallow emotional response
  • callousness and lack of empathy
  • parasitic lifestyle
  • poor behavioral controls
  • sexual promiscuity
  • early behavior problems
  • lack of realistic long-term goals
  • impulsivity
  • irresponsibility
  • failure to accept responsibility
  • many short-term marital relationships
  • juvenile delinquency
  • revocation of conditional release
  • criminal versatility

Does Soro fit the bill? We have already seen him declare himself a god.

SOROS: PUTIN IS NO ALLY IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ISLAMIC STATE

In the Guardian’s article, then, Soros claims “the US and the EU are making a grievous error in thinking that President Vladimir Putin’s Russia is a potential ally in the fight against Islamic State.

The assumptions here are based on pure falsehood. My colleague, the diligent and forthright journalist and writer Gearóid Ó Colmáin laid an ax as sharp as any to the root of the notion that the so-called War on Terror (taken to include Islamic State) serves anything other than the interests of what Ó Colmáin rightly calls a “tiny and particularly tyrannical ruling elite”.

In an interview with RT, Ó Colmáin said, “There is no War on Terror. There is a war which is being waged using terrorist proxy groups and they are being used against nation-states who are resisting the US and Israeli hegemony. And they are also being used as a means of disciplining the workforces in Europe. In a period of mass unemployment and austerity, you now have terrorist attacks being committed by terrorists funded, armed, and trained by Western intelligence agencies. There is no such thing as ISIS. ISIS is a creation of the United States.”

Soros and his ilk created and benefit from what Soros calls the “Islamic State,” yet his argument not only disregards that fact, it kicks blame in the direction of the one major power – Russia – which has taken steps to deal with this US creation.

Soros goes on to make a number of other accusations against Russia, failing at any time to note that Russia alone has a mandate from the legitimate government of Syria, or that Russia is seriously engaged in cleaning house in Syria, a job the US was only simulating.

SOROS: PUTIN WORKING TOWARDS EUROPE’S DEMISE

Soros’ next point is that “Putin’s aim is to foster the EU’s disintegration, and the best way to do so is to flood Europe with Syrian refugees.”

The truth is that Russia’s natural ally is Germany – and preventing that alliance is the primary aim of the US government – at least according to Stratfor, a US intelligence agency.

Germany’s efficiency and organizational abilities combined with Russia’s raw materials, inventive genius, and good relations with China, are the combination those funding and directing ISIS least want to see. By occupying Germany with an army of aggressive, unskilled, culturally insoluble economic migrants from Africa and elsewhere, the chess players at the board of realpolitik are attempting to head off that natural outcome.

Soros’ part in destabilizing Europe is well attested. The Daily Mail reported back in November 2015 that Soros was busy telling the EU to take “at least a million” refugees every year.

In the same article, Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban is quoted as saying, “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other hand by those activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state.” Orban went on, “This Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George Soros.”

Soros – described in the article as “a funder of pro-migration groups all over the world” – responded to Orban’s comments by arguing that his beliefs “uphold European values”.

I don’t know what Soros means by “European values,” but I assume it includes lots more immigration for us – unilaterally decided upon by Mr. Soros.

Migrants and refugees queue to board a train in the town of Sid, Serbia © Marko Djurica / Reuters

As prime minister of Hungary, Orban is a man with, perhaps, better access than most to the truth about George Soros, a Hungarian Jew who got his first business breaks collaborating with the Nazis in Hungary – the source for which information is his own father’s book Masquerade – Dancing Around Death in Nazi-Occupied Hungary. Thus, Soros has moved effortlessly from collaborating with the Nazis against his fellow Jews – an occupation (if you will excuse the pun) he makes little effort to hide – to telling indigenous European peoples what the ethnic make-up of their countries should be.

He was also instrumental in the destruction of Ukraine. As reported by New American, Soros “has a giant footprint in Ukraine. Similar to his operations in dozens of other nations, he has, over the past couple of decades, poured tens of millions of dollars into Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs), ostensibly to assist them in transforming their country into a more ‘open’ and ‘democratic’ society.

We have good reason to take George Soros seriously.

SOROS: ANTICIPATES RUSSIA’S COLLAPSE

Soros’ article downplays Putin’s strategic prowess before going on to anticipate regime change in Russia in 2017 as a result of bankruptcy forced upon it by Western sanctions and crushed oil prices.

He then appears to credit Putin with masterminding a “collapse” in Europe and of anticipating benefits for Russia in the aftermath. He notes, “As Merkel correctly foresaw, the migration crisis has the potential to destroy it.

If you find yourself asking here: “Why then did she create that crisis?” that is because you are not a psychopath.

Soros’ article begins its descent with metaphysical and social observations, which from someone without billions of dollars behind them would be seen as merely subjective musings, before landing squarely on the runway of identifying Putin’s Russia as the real threat.

TEXTBOOK PSYCHOPATHY

This is not simply chutzpah. The traits Soros exhibits are those of textbook psychopathy: blaming others for his own actions and attacking the victim is what the psychopath does.

Here, Soros disregards entirely his own extensive role in creating the problem he purports to seek to solve; meanwhile, he accuses Russia, the only country to man up to the war on Syria, of being behind the “migration” Soros has spent millions engineering.

Soros is part of a cabal that plans the overthrow of countries at dinner. Psychopathy is the baseline requirement for membership. So if you think conscience will make him and his friends stop at some point before you and your family reach conditions materially identical to those experienced by the inhabitants of the Donbas region – or if you think that Western Europe is beyond the scope of their plans for engineered collapse just because you wouldn’t do something like that – you will find that you are wrong.

When Europe is in tatters, and its men (whom Soros’ money helped turn in one lifetime from actual men into effeminized liberal cultural lemmings) are squawking in disbelief as their pampered delusions are shattered in the “collapse” Soros envisages, Soros will not care. No matter that this is Europe and it is your life under attack this time, and not that of brown people or Eastern Europeans. It won’t make any difference.

For a psychopath it’s simple: you let him do it – it’s your fault.

IN HIS IMAGE: GAME OVER

It is hard to believe that it has been 20 years since many of us fired up our modems and ventured on to what was called the information superhighway. It was rumored that this would be a miraculous tool for information gathering and marketing. It became arguably one of the greatest inventions in the world. The information superhighway became the web, and from there we now have social media, entertainment, and information from what is now known as the internet.

Fifteen years ago, the Clinton Administration proposed an archetype for how the internet should be governed that remains the most succinct articulation of a pro-liberty, market-oriented vision for the web ever penned. It recommended that we rely on civil society, contractual negotiations, voluntary agreements, and ongoing marketplace experiments to solve information age problems. In essence, they were recommending a high-tech Hippocratic oath: First, do no harm to the internet. For the first time government believed in the people to officiate and regulate its own library of sorts. Of course, this was met with political fears of undue influence from pornographic sites, independent news sites, and later websites that allegedly radicalized terrorists.

It is because of these so-called overstatements of arguable influence of what is seen as cyber heresy that most governments across the globe including ours here in the U.S are increasingly taking a very different approach about how the internet should be governed.

While many politicians promised originally to keep their “hands off the net,” today it’s more like “Hands all over the Net.” It is difficult to name an area where policymakers are not currently threatening or at least considering controls for the Internet and related digital technologies.

In the past, we would hear stories about how some politicians wanted to regulate the net. We had heard about internet taxes, high load regulation, and the possible turning over of all keys to the net to foreign interests that are more than happy to block content.

In January of 2012, we started seeing some aggressive activity from the government regarding internet policy and control. The bipartisan cry was “Why to fix what isn’t broken” and suddenly we began to see what appeared to be a manufactured rebellion against all attempts at controlling the commerce, communication, and fundamental use of the internet.

Richard Clarke the former counter-terrorism Czar told Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig that there would be in the foreseeable future what he called an “I-911” or internet 911 where a major attack would take place online. This event would force Government officials to incorporate an internet “patriot act” limiting freedom of speech and freedom of movement online.

It was so predictable that in the midst of all of the struggles for control by the Obama administration, there would be attempts at rebelling against the laws and attempted take-overs.

Web blackouts occurred and one could speculate that the attacks on the Justice Department sites, the RIAA, the MPAA, et. al. were all carried out by the government claiming to be that hacking group Anonymous.

The RIAA and the MPAA were always in the crosshairs of so-called hacking events. Recently the MPAA and Sony were allegedly hacked and the FBI stepped into the state for the record that the hacks came from North Korea, even though there was no proof that this was the case.

Then it was announced that the hacks included leaks of well-known Sony movie titles. However, there was one movie title that was not leaked to the net and that was the film The Interview. This film was being used as a scapegoat for the hostility towards Sony from North Korea because it was a satirical film about the assassination of Kim Jong Un.

The whole hacker story and its ties to a controversial film was a simple intelligence play that was done earlier. It was a similar ploy that was carried out during the Bengasi attacks where intelligence blamed the film The Innocence of Muslims, for what eventually enraged angry mobs that torched a building and killed the American ambassador in Benghazi.

Armed attackers killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Some U.S. officials, speaking under anonymity, said that they believed the Benghazi attack was coordinated and planned in advance, and not prompted by the film.

The false flag attack was carried out coincidentally on 9/11/2012.

Ground Zero reported immediately after the hacks that a false flag event had taken place to break up and control the Domain Name System (DNS), the backbone of the internet. Ground Zero also reported that documents were leaked about how the MPAA wanted to somehow ingratiate itself through the new proposals brought forth for the so-called “net neutrality” to go after websites that pirated music and films.

It was reported that documents that were leaked to reveal a frightening line of attack that’s currently being considered by the MPAA: What if you simply erased any record that the site was there in the first place?

The leaked memo “sketches out a legal case for blocking infringing sites from the DNS records entirely, like wiping unsavory addresses out of the phone book.” It has been shown in the past that some of the pirating on the internet that Hollywood studios have been complaining about is done by people on the payroll of said studios. This allows them to cry “more internet control” and this DNS tactic shows just how Hollywood would accomplish it without any congressional law.

Once again we are now seeing a false flag attack with a motive and a plan and it most certainly would mean MPAA controls in order to halt the piracy of films and music.

The MPAA’s lawyers would target the Domain Name System (DNS) that directs traffic across the internet in order to simply erase them on an ISP level.

The tactic was first proposed as part of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in 2011, but three years after the law failed in Congress, the MPAA has been looking for legal justification for the practice in existing law and working with ISPs like Comcast to examine how a system might work technically. If the system works, DNS-blocking could be the key to the MPAA’s long-standing goal of blocking sites from delivering content to the US. At the same time, it represents a bold challenge to the basic engineering of the internet, threatening to break the very backbone of the web and drawing the industry into an increasingly nasty fight with Google.

DNS addresses are like phone numbers and if the MPAA was to find the “phone number” from a pirate site they could simply erase it and no one would be able to find it and use it for illegal downloads of their films. They would also be able to trace the ISP to anyone on the inside pirating their films to these websites.

Websites would be issued a takedown notice from media companies like SONY who use MPAA lawyers to prosecute pirates.

According to an MPAA memo, “A takedown notice program, therefore, could threaten ISPs with potential secondary liability in the event that they do not cease connecting users to known infringing material through their own DNS servers, While not making it impossible for users to reach pirate sites (i.e., a user could still use a third-party DNS server), it could make it substantially more complicated for casual infringers to reach pirate sites if their ISPs decline to assist in the routing of communications to those sites.”

As critics pointed out in the SOPA debate, site-blocking measures could also be used by bad actors to knock a site offline with just a bogus copyright claim. DMCA notices have already drawn criticism for overly hasty or broadly applied blocks, and extending that power to DNS records would spread those problems across the web at large. Crucially, any takedown notices deployed under this scheme would simply invoke the threat of liability and further legal action, pressuring the DNS servers to delist the site without ever hearing the issue in court.

This would once again violate constitutional rights for due process and would definitely slow the internet down and handicap its efficiency.

Now comes Barack Obama and his so-called concerns about the internet and its policies conveniently is used as the cornerstone argument for net neutrality. Net Neutrality of course is a great idea because we have had it now for 18 years. Barack Obama seems to have new ideas of what net neutrality entails, just like he had new ideas on how to improve health care.

Obama may fool people with his doublespeak, and it is foolish to say that you are against net neutrality, but do we really need internet in his image with his principles and his forfeiture of responsibility handed over to the FCC?

Released in July 1997, their Framework for Global Electronic Commerce was drafted by President Clinton’s chief policy advisor Ira Magaziner. The choice of Magaziner to lead the initiative was originally greeted with suspicion by some in the Internet policy community since he had previously spearheaded the Administration’s controversial health care reform effort, which prescribed a heavy dose of government intervention.

Luckily, as it turned out, at least when it came to internet policy, Magaziner had far more in common with Adam Smith than Karl Marx. The administration’s Framework for net governance was rooted in five liberty-enhancing principles for net governance that still resonate today. In fact, it can be said that this was an unofficial constitution or at least a basic framework for Internet law and its purpose

However, Barack Obama is now saying that the Framework is no longer applicable and feels that it is time to make the internet a public utility. This is what he means by Net Neutrality. It is similar to his lack of respect for the constitution.

Allowing the government to run the internet like a utility opens the door to abuse.

The Framework for Global Electronic Commerce always stated that the private sector should be the self-governing force for the internet. As it said:

Even where collective action is necessary, governments should encourage industry self-regulation and private sector leadership where possible.

The Framework explicitly states that “governments should avoid undue restrictions on electronic commerce” and “parties should be able to enter into legitimate agreements to buy and sell products and services across the Internet with minimal government involvement or intervention.” It would be hard to articulate a more pro-capitalist recommendation than that but, better yet, the Framework continued on to note that “governments should refrain from imposing new and unnecessary regulations, bureaucratic procedures or new taxes and tariffs on commercial activities that take place via the internet.”

“Where governmental involvement is needed,” the Framework continued, “its aim should be to support and enforce a predictable, minimalist, consistent and simple legal environment for commerce.” This is where the Framework ventured into the somewhat more controversial territory by trying to deal with intellectual property, privacy, and security issues. These remain hotly-contested issues today but the Framework offered a generally constructive, “light-touch” approach to dealing with those matters.

Remember it was this “Hands off the ‘Net” approach that unleashed the internet’s staggering innovation. That bipartisan approach made possible the $1.3 trillion dollars of private investment that built today’s broadband networks.

Now Obama wants his hands all over the internet and he is using Net Neutrality as a cover for imposing old laws and restrictions on how you operate the net. Obama wants to hand the internet over to the FCC for control.

Some advocates are pushing for “Title II.” That’s code for 1930s-style utility regulation. Title II would put the FCC squarely in the middle of the Internet — right beside the NSA. It saddles the Internet with price controls and other heavy-handed rules from a thankfully long-gone era. The debate over Title II isn’t a debate over net neutrality, which is why many net neutrality proponents actually oppose Title II. Instead, it’s a debate between a vocal minority that wants greater government control over broadband companies, and defenders of a bipartisan consensus around a “Hands Off the Internet” approach.

Title II would crush broadband investment, and it won’t even ban the practices, like fast lanes, that its advocates worry about. It would hurt start-ups by saddling them with excessive regulation, and it would protect big broadband companies from new competitors, leaving consumers with even fewer choices. Title II would also hurt the under-served by slowing deployment in minority and rural communities. And it would vastly increase the FCC’s powers over the internet.

We already see how the FCC controls the content on television and radio. Do we want restrictions online? Also, treating the internet like a utility is basically saying that the internet is like water, sewer, and electricity.

While water and electricity are necessities, the internet really isn’t. Now for many people, it is a necessity for business, work, and social events. The utility companies have standardized water and electricity as basic products with very little more than what you are paying for.

They can charge a lot for their standardized utilities and they run the risk of being monopolies — being a monopoly gives them the ability to be less innovative and regulation protects them from the competition. Broadband providers are constantly pushing the boundaries of technology to keep pace with exploding demand. If you regulate broadband like you regulate water, competition will evaporate, and with it, the incentive to keep upgrading networks.

Applying FCC controls with the Title II provisions to IP networks creates a new Federal Computer Commission with authority to weigh in on everything connected to an IP network.

This means everything.

Do we really need to have the internet of the 21st century hook up with a regulatory body that was scorned and ridiculed for its draconian controls of free speech in the 20th century?

I guess Obama feels so strongly about this and wants you to believe this is net neutrality.

In reality, it is GAME OVER.